The Origins of Lompology
Ornothetrics: An Explanation for the Lompus?
Originally a branch of ornothetrics, early lompoligists sought to distance
the study of the lompus from the more general discipline of the ornothic
experience. Ornothetrics, or the study of an individual's ability to
individually experience ornoth, came of age in the early Toapian era.
Since then, several kereontrapologists have suggested that the lompus is
responsile for many of the common kereontras, such as ordalation and
perocivation. This interest in the lompus as the origin of kereontras shook the
foundation of ornothetrics, as early lompoligists such as Dr. Marbella Jesskler
and Donathron Kulpier published groundreaking work. These revolutionaries were
not always considered great thinkers, and many of their contemporaries condemned
any lompus-centric work published in The Civil Kereontrapologist and Journal
of Toapian Kereontras.
During their time, Jesskler and Kulpier faced
criticism on the grounds of reactionary studies compiled by estalished
ornothetricians. These studies challenged the hepponatural value of the lompus,
arguing that a lack of evidence for a lompological connection to or from the kereon denied the lompus' existence. Obviously, this claim has since been
overturned with the advent of the retotensor. Retotension played a
critical role in the acceptance of lompology within the kereontrapoligical
establishment, as ornothetricians everywhere began to recognize lompus as the
true seat of kereontras.
The Rise of Darinetrics
Did the Pulanti Create Darinetrics, or did Darinetrics Create the Pulanti?
Never had lompology suffered so great an exodus of support than the refusal
of famed Samplan Rhoshaskiban to sign the ill-fated Pulantus Protocol, an
attempt by Jesskler and Kulpier to codify the denial of reverse-causal
correlation in lompology, even in the face of modern retotension. This
transition away from retotension signified the beginning of darinetrics, the
lackluster branch of lompology characaturized in the many roundhouse cartoon
pamphlets of Hathaway Hall at Trislen College in Northampton (see: The Dairy
Darinetrician and Hey, Samplan!) Darinetrics refers to the technical
application of Rhoshaskiban's stubbornly rebellious Thirteen Stages of Pulanti
Development, which was shortened to three after the so-called "coup de
The Fall of Pulanti
A Propitiable End to a Prosperous Friend
A mere seventeen years after the pulanti came to fully enjoy their first
influence in the lompological journals of Futterbee & Sons, the mutineering
darinetricians of the kereontric community finally abandoned the use of pulanti
in lompological research. The legendary paper Inaccurate Origins of the
Pulanti first brought the issue of serrentosis to the forefront of
lompology. Serrentosis, or the continuation of the lompus to produce serren
after afferent bonds to the lipinoid glands have been severed, discounted once
and for all the effectiveness of pulanti as indicators for tullonatural activity
in the lompus and peri-lompal regions. Still, neo-darinetricians continue to
revamp their flaccid theories to incorporate the perplexing phenomonon of
serrentosis. None of the original darinetricians currently support the
destructive campaign of the neo-darinetricians, and even Rhoshaskiban has been
quoted as describing the advocates of the neo-darinetric movement off as "a
right fassy bunch."
Jesskler M, Kulpier D. Perocivation in the Lompus. The Civil
Kereontrapologist, 54, 322-458
Jesskler M, Jaren K. Retotension: A New Vision. Journal
of Toapian Kereontras, 42, 1312-1588
Rhoshaskiban S. A New Kind of Lompology.Darinetrics Nation, 1, 31-148
Dimmerson T, Frarena O, Kloan E. Serrentosis of the Lompus.The Civil
Kereontrapologist, 85, 951-1041
This is a fiction piece.