Why is it when you say this, you have to provide
supporting evidence? It's just like if you say "I'm not
hungry.". "Well, why not?" "I just ate." "How long ago?" "About an hour." "What did you have to eat?" "
McDonald's." "Are you sure you're not hungry?" "Yes." "Yes, you're hungry?" "No, yes I'm sure I don't want to fucking eat." This works for "I'm not
gay" as well.
"
Are you gay? I saw your write-up on E2 about a
Gay Code." "No, I'm not
gay." "Then why would you write it?" "Because I thought it would be
thought-provoking and
homosexuality is one of the few
controversial topics left, although it may soon gain
mainstream acceptance just like
Alternative music did." "So if you aren't gay, why do you know so much about it?" "I know how to make a
crack pipe and
roll a joint too, that doesn't mean I do
drugs." "You know WHAT?!" "Arrgh, I give up." "So you're saying you're
gay AND you
smoke crack and
pot?" "No, I'm
straight - and I don't do drugs... You've never seen me
smoking anything, and I never
smell like smoke." "Well I've never seen you with a
woman either..." "That's because I'm a
GEEK." "But you do like
women, right?" "Yes... Check out my
pr0n collection." "What!?"
To clarify, I am not likening doing
drugs to
homosexuality - I am likening the assimilation of knowledge to the assumption that knowing about something means you are
speaking from experience.
Once you bring up something related to
homosexuality, there's no easy way to get yourself
out...