Recently during the

campaigning for

president, Mr.

Hale and Mr.

Brady, began to notice that certain candidates for president seeemed much more

qualified than others. As we began to work

numbers, we realized that there was in fact a

mathematical relationship between the approximate

maturity level of a candidate and his actual age. The

formula to determine this

maturity level is as follows:

NA ?
---- = ----
CA AN

Where NA = the normal age at which people do a certain thing, CA = the age at which the candidate does this thing, and AN = the candidate's age now. From this, we can solve for ? which is the candidate's maturity level. Let us take, for example, George W. Bush:

We decided that most people stop drinking (heavily) at about age 25, wheras Bush stopped drinking (according to him) at age 40. After putting in Bush's current age of 54, it is simple to determine that his approximate maturity is 33.75 years of age. Thus, *he isn't old enough to run*. Using numbers based upon candidate Ralph Nader's writing of __Unsafe at Any Speed__, you can determine that he is in fact somewhere in the neighborhood of 180 years of age. Thus, you should do everything in your power to prevent the constitutional problem of having an ineligible president be elected. Thus, you must vote for either Gore or Nader, depending on the closeness of the race in your state: If it is a Bush landslide in your state, vote Nader. Otherwise, vote Gore.