Enter a room, an office of some sort. A woman sits alone, in typical
office wear, seemingly the only occupant of said room. She is unaware
that you are watching her, and instead engrossed by her own massive
breasts. She looks shocked, as if she has never seen them before, and
is observedly aroused by them, in fact worryingly so, since no woman
should be particularly surprised, let alone astounded, by having
breasts. It's not like they appear overnight.
So this woman is
aroused, and you can tell this by her look of amazement and the little
gasps that emerge from her mouth every few seconds, and by the fact
that she is now rubbing the front of her workshirt in circles as she
gasps. Her expression and exclamations are more than a little like a 5
year old child opening a Christmas present. But it is not cute because
of this. It's weird.
I have no idea why, who or how....this is just what happens.
So
suddenly a man in a suit appears from nowhere. The woman looks upset,
and it's pretty clear that this man is her 'boss'. He proceeds to scold
her, and then force her to open her shirt. Her private joy is invaded
by this man wielding a proverbial club of power, and though she looks
pretty disgusted at the idea, eventually he prises her shirt open and
pulls her breasts out of her bra. He then proceeds to play childishly,
pulling on her bra straps to make her breasts move up and down.
I have no idea how this is sexy, but apparently it gets Korean men off.
Judging
by Korean porn, the kind provided for free in 'love' (sex) motels all
over the country, women do *not* enjoy sex. At most, and I mean in
the least revolting way, they are bored by sex and are doing it to get the
guy off.
At worst, and I mean in the most stomach-churning
way, the woman is having what looks like a fucking-awful-time. Cajolled
and manipulated into the set up, either by boss, blackmailer or just
plain ole street rapist, she spends the entire time wincing, frowning
or being on the verge of embarrassed tears.
The woman's act of
resistance and reluctant acceptance of sex portrays a clear message
to the viewer - women do not enjoy sex. They are not meant to enjoy
sex. They are meant to do it in the end, but put up a respectable
amount of resistance first and preferably throughout the whole shebang
(ha). Their whimpers are more pitiful than a baby squirrel in danger
and their pained expressions are more wince-inducing than the sight of
a guy falling crotch-first onto a metal fence.
And this is what Korean men jerk off to?
Western
porn on the other hand goes completely onto the other path of
misogynistic tendancy, not the asexual woman too 'pure' to enjoy sex,
but the insatiable whore-monster who cannot rest until she has had all
the cock in the land. The slag-whore-bitch-ho-cocksucker-fuck-pig
route is far more explicit in its dehumanisation of women, but it is
just another form of the same misogyny in a different wolf's
clothing. This is the woman who cannot help herself - she is unable to
control her lust, she is consumed by it, and so must consume as much
cock as possible to satisfy it. Nevermind the fact that most porn is as
unimaginative as possible, I guess partly cuz guys need as little help
as anyone to actually get off, and if all you want is a palmful of
jizzum in the fastest time possible, that is what you need. The formula
of insatiable woman, readily available now and always, no matter how
fat and ugly the guy is, seems to be the staple undercurrent that is
found in Western porn. Western men, it seems, need to be reassured
that women want it, no matter what, and that a slag is the ultimate
woman-tool for degrading and finally dehumanising a woman into an
object that is as unthreatening as possible.
The two views of
women have run throughout the long history of misogyny, repeating
themselves with the kind of cycles of unimagination reflected in porn
today. The Greeks did it, the Romans did it, the Christians did
it, the Muslims did it, and the Victorians did it better than
anyone.