The important point to remember here is that just because someone doesn’t agree with Creationist Intelligent Design doesn’t mean they reject God.

The biggest reason that Creationist ID fails as a science is because it isn’t defined in any clarity at all. Darwin defined what evolution is and explained its mechanisms very carefully and clearly.

Can Creationist ID proponents say the same? How closely to Bible lore does ID hew to? Did God create everything in 7 days about 5,000 years ago? I want to see a paper that clearly lays out the argument on Creationist ID as opposed to all the current method that relies on attacking evolution.

For example, I personally believe that there is something greater than us, but that no person alive knows the nature of the miracle. Who is to say that evolution is not the mechanism established to create intelligence in this universe?

Any dynamic system needs processes to maintain and improve it, and life is dynamic, not static. Evolution as an adaptation mechanism is vital to ensure life can survive in the face of an environment subject to change from influences both local (hurricanes and volcanoes) and extreme (asteroid strike).

What if God is in the details? Just establishing a universe with consistent laws and mechanisms that function in a way that fosters life is a divine achievement. Why can't the "big bang" be the first push of the domino?

Sadly, so far every ID argument I have encountered is a disingenuous repackaging of creationism that ignores most of the facts involved.