As everyone knows (especially revolutionaries), hierarchy maintains formidable defenses against attack from lower orders. It has none, however, against abandonment. This is in part because it can imagine revolution, but it can’t imagine abandonment. But even if it could imagine abandonment, it couldn’t defend against it, because abandonment isn’t an attack, it’s just a discontinuance of support."
- user since
- Mon Sep 24 2001 at 04:02:34 (19.4 years ago )
- last seen
- Tue Apr 13 2010 at 04:54:36 (10.9 years ago )
- number of write-ups
- 27 - View NOTfnordian's writeups (feed)
- level / experience
- 3 (Scribe) / 822
- No thanks.
- most recent writeup
- An open letter to Michael Moore
- Send private message to NOTfnordian
"Because revolution in our culture has always represented an attack on hierarchy, it has always meant upheaval – literally a heaving up from below. But upheaval has no role to play in moving beyond civilization. If the plane is in trouble, you don’t shoot the pilot, you grab a parachute and jump. To overthrow the hierarchy is pointless; we just want to leave it behind.