display | more...

Everyone who lives in a city (that has cars for hire) has probably experienced this: several of you pack into a taxi, and you give the driver a laundry list of stops to make. You're the first person out, and the meter reads $n (or substitute your local currency). How much should you contribute? Given that the primary purpose of sharing the taxi is to split the cost of the fare, what is an equitable strategy for doing it?

Before we go leaping into the arithmetic, we have to define what a "fair" method is, so we start from first principles. Assume the fare at the first stop is n. Obviously the full n is too much to contribute: if there is only one more stop left and it is two blocks away, the second person contributes almost nothing. What we would like, then, is a system where riders contribute for only the portion of the ride that they enjoy.

OK, so method #1: if there are (say) 3 stops, and the meter reads a, b, and c respectively when each of the three riders gets out, then each rider should pay the fraction of the fare equal to the ride he or she enjoyed divided by the sum of the fares for the rides everyone enjoyed (the total person-cost). Since the total fare is c (the meter amount at the last stop), the first rider would pay the fraction a/(a+b+c) of c, or ac/(a+b+c). The second rider would pay bc/(a+b+c) and the third would pay c^2/(a+b+c). Great -- we're done.

This is fair by our operative definition, but unfortunately it is totally and utterly impractical. It involves arithmetic that most people would find hard to do in their heads, especially after they've had a few beers (Try it: a=5.25, b=7.60, c=12.45. What's bc(a+b+c)?), which may be why they're taking a taxi home in the first place. Furthermore, unless this is the kind of ride you do on a regular basis with the same stops, all of the quantities aren't known until the last person gets out, so it is not even possible to do the calculation without estimating the quantities. What would be better is something fair, where all the quantities are known when you pay, and which is relatively practical.

So method #2 (more practical): As a participant in this process, all you have to remember to do before your stop is (1) hold on to the money that the person who gets out at the previous stop gives to you, and (2) note the amount on the meter when that happens. Then when your stop comes:

  • take whatever money was given to you by the previous person and contribute the same amount with your money. You now have twice as much money in your hand.
  • look at the meter. Subtract from it the meter amount you were asked to remember from when the last person got out (this is obviously 0 if you are the first stop), and then divide by the number of riders left (including you). Add this amount to the money already in your hand (if any).
  • give this big wad o'cash to the next person scheduled to get out, reminding them to note the amount on the meter.
  • get out of the taxi, secure in the knowledge that you have paid your fair share.

The process repeats for all passengers, and the last person pays the driver the full fare.

Why this works: Consider that another, perhaps better operative definition of fairness is that at any given time, a passenger should be splitting the cost of the ride with the number of people in the car. That means that for N people when person A gets out and the meter reads a, he or she should contribute a/N. When B gets out, the contribution should be a/N (for the first segment) + (b - a)/(N - 1) (for the second segment). It's easy to see that this is equivalent to the algorithm described above.

What it looks like: It's interesting to look at the differences between these two methods for various types of rides. Here's what each passenger pays for a 4-stop ride with relatively evenly-spaced stops:

#left   fare  Method 1  Method 2
------  ----  --------  --------
  4       5      1.92     1.25
  3      10      3.85     2.92
  2      17      6.54     6.42
  1      20      7.69     9.42

And here it is for stops where each is twice as far as the previous one:

#left   fare  Method 1  Method 2
------  ----  --------  --------
  4      2      1.07      0.50
  3      4      2.13      1.17
  2      8      4.27      3.17
  1      16     8.53      11.17

Note that this is still probably too cumbersome to actually use in the real world (people tend to split cabs using bills, without resorting to fumbling with change, which introduces errors in the recursion), but as a toy problem it is quite interesting because it hinges as much on the operative definition of "fair" and the need to have information at specific times as it does the mathematics.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.