display | more...
We know that Gradients traditionally come in the form of G(x,y) = A(x,y)i+B(x,y)j -- yet, not every function in this form is a Gradient. This becomes critical if one is trying to reconstruct a function from what's believed to be the Gradient. We know that in the above form, A(x,y) is the partial in respect to x (df/dx) and B(x,y) is the partial in respect to y (df/dy) and for any function continuously differentiable

df/dxdy = df/dydx

Hence, if we differentiate A(x,y)(df/dx) in respect to y we attain df/dxdy; if we differentiate B(x,y)(df/dy) in respect to y we get df/dydx. Setting these equal, we are able to tell if the function is indeed a gradient.

Drawing an example from a previous node:

g(x,y)=(4x3y3 - 3x2)i + (3x4y2 + cos 2y)j

df/dx(x,y) = (4x3y3 - 3x2)
df/dy(x,y) = (3x4y2 + cos 2y)

df/dxdy = 12x3y2
df/dydx = 12x3y2

12x3y2 = 12x3y2

So the function is a Gradient.

ariels says OK then. But a function
can be a gradient without being further
differentiable, and still possess partial

Very true. In this case... I don't exactly know what you would do, except trying to reconstruct the function and seeing if anything of value comes out.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.