The Pawn in chess has long been one of the most studied pieces in the game. François Philidor famously declared "Pawns are the soul of chess", and the defense which bears his name creates a tense, waiting-game for the black pieces as its motif is to watch the center, evaluate pawn structures, and attack the weak points therein. Pawns, while being the most numerous piece on the board, also have more "special moves" than any other piece in the game. Sure, the King might be able to castle with a Rook, but the lowly pawn has three tricks at its disposal: the first move double step, the ability to capture en passant, and the ability to promote itself to a new piece upon reaching the 8th rank on the board.
Historically, the pawn used to have no selection power upon reaching the 8th rank. In chaturanga, the India-developed variant and almost-certain precursor to modern chess, the pawn would automatically promote to the Vizier - chess' "proto-Queen". A weaker version of the modern piece, the Vizier could move only one square along either diagonal from its starting position1. In chess, the pawn may promote to any piece other than a King or another Pawn, a feat that happens during approximately 1.5% of games. When a promotion does occur, the promoting player chooses a Queen nearly 97% of the time. A knight is selected 1.8% of the time, a rook 1.1%, and the poor bishop only 0.2% of all promotions2. These three piece selections are referred to, in aggregate, as underpromotions.
There are three valid reasons why a player might choose underpromotion.
- When choosing a Queen would lead to an immediate stalemate
- When choosing a Knight would lead to an immediate gain of material via a fork
- When choosing to illustrate to your 8 year old nephew that, yes really, I did lose that last game on purpose and, yes really, I am promoting a fifth bishop, Timothy!
The first two reasons are illustrated below, with brief annotations.
Scenario 1:
Black to move, White wins.
White to move, brilliant underpromotion.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
♙ |
|
♚ |
7 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
♙ |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
♔ |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
Underpromotion Scenario 1: Black to move
Move | White | Black | Annotation |
1 | f7 | Kh8 | Forced |
2 | f8=Q+ | Kh7 | Forced |
3 | Qg7# | 1-0 | Very easy mating pattern |
Underpromotion Scenario 1: White to move
Move | White | Black | Annotation |
1 | f8=B! | Kg8 (or Kh8) | f8Q? would have created an instant stalemate, with no free squares for the black king. Bishop avoids stalemate, and controls the queening square for the remaining rook pawn! |
2 | Bg7 | Kh7 | White connects pawn and bishop, Black hopes to wedge himself on h7 |
3 | Bf6 | Kg8 | White owns h8, Black forced off its mark |
4 | Kg6 | Kf8 | White takes the opposition, Black's move is forced |
5 | h7 | Ke8 | White has too much synergy, Black's move is forced |
6 | h8=Q+ | Kd7 | White achieves a completely overpowering endgame |
Further study of Scenario 1 is documented within Saavedra position.
Scenario 2:
Jones, Gawain C (2664) vs. Raznikov, Danny (2492)3
PokerStars Open | Douglas | Round 9 | 12 Oct 2014 | ECO: B90 | 1-0
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
7 |
|
♟ |
♖ |
♙ |
|
|
|
|
7 |
6 |
♟ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
5 |
|
♚ |
♙ |
|
|
♟ |
|
|
5 |
4 |
|
♟ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
♔ |
|
|
♜ |
3 |
2 |
♙ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
Sources
1 - Wikipedia. "History of chess". Accessed 11/15/2018.
2 - Wikipedia. "Promotion (chess)". Accessed 11/15/2018.
3 - Chess.com. "A guide to underpromotion". Accessed 11/15/2018.
IronNoder 2018: 13/30