I have
serious doubt as to the
plausibility of this idea.
Anarchy, as a
philosophical concept, is an interesting
abstract to argue. However ... there is an
entire movement of people who are
honestly searching for this sort of reality.
Outside of the argument of the
beneficial/
detrimental value of anarchy, there is this
plausibility question. Can people really have no
structure, no
leaders? Sure ... I can
buy that thre can be a lack of real
government (
hell ... look at many
African nations, such as
Somalia), but there is a
real sociological finding that people
naturally seek leaders.
Even looking at the
anarchist movement, this is
seen. For a
movement to
exist, there must be one or more
motivators or
leaders. It seems that even within those people most
vehemently buying into
anarchy, they cannot
realize their
ideals.