display | more...
The official American term referring to the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001 in New York City, and all its resultant effects upon the United States and the world.

"9/11" was officially decreed by the American Dialect Society as the new word of 2001 "most likely to last."

It appears in the fourth edition of the American Heritage College Dictionary, released in 2002.

There is a kind of endless and indirect conversation that takes place among TV broadcasters and writers, all of whom listen to each other's shows as a matter of course. I think the name "nine-eleven" gained its dominance as part of this conversation. It does not follow the usual format for naming dates of importance, and I suspect it could not have become the predominant name if people had not heard it spoken aloud. "9/11" might have been read "September Eleventh" in familiar practice if people had only seen it in print, but plainly there was a sense somewhere that a different sort of name was appropriate and I suspect it was able to spread by sound.

Early in the days after the September 11th attacks, other names were also to be heard. Some people said "September Eleventh", which is the traditional way of naming dates of importance. "September the Eleventh", a little more formal, or reminiscent of British usage, also cropped up. Some people also said "nine-one-one", which suggested one of the numerological explanations for the terrorists' choice of date. But a year after the event it is clear that "nine-eleven" has become the name I hear most often. I have been quite conscious of the trend, because this is not a name that sounds comfortable to me.

"..we are making a documentary about a fire fighter.."
"Come on. This ain't fucking Disneyland. Let's go."

Made-for-television documentary of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11 2001.

In mid-2001 French film makers and brothers Gédéon Naudet and James Hanlon started making a documentary on a New York City fireman rookie named Tony undertaking his probationary period. The summer passes and to his great disapointment he fights nothing more challenging than a single automobile ablaze. Then one day as another part of the station investigates a suspect gas leak, one of the hijacked aircraft flies low and fast overhead and hits one of the towers. This is captured on film by Gédéon, one of only two pieces of film of the first attack.

Gédéon then accompanies the firefighters to the World Trade Center, where a base is set up in the lobby of the other tower. He accompanies Fire Chief Joseph Pfiefer, who coordinates rescue and firefighting work with several other fire crews. The second plane then hits the tower he is in, sending debris and bodies falling from outside. With elevators out of action, sprinkler systems totally inadequate and people barely comprending the magnitude of the challenge, the fire crews appear frustrated. After the first tower collapses, Chief Pfeifer sends the order to evacuate, just before the second collapses. Gédéon and the crew are twice submered in a surrealistic sea of dust and paper; these are the most compelling scenes.

Meanwhile Tony is left at the fire station. James films the rookie being so frustrated that he is unable to fight the fire that he considers abandoning his post. After the towers collapse in the back of his mind James is seriously concerned about what has happened to his brother. Eventually they reunite when the (almost) casualty free fire crew return, with much back slapping and hugging following. Much which follows consists of searching "the pile" for signs of bodies, and much emoting from individual members of the fire crew about the magnitude of the tragedy.

It was broadcast on CBS as part of a fundraising exercise, compared by Robert De Niro. Unfortunately out of the hands of the French brothers the documentary was re-editted with unnecessary stylised features more becoming of a cheap current affair show: incessant soft piano playing, voice overs stating the bleeding obvious and important scenes that are suddenly interrupted by yet another witness account of a firefighter retelling what we are actually trying to concentrate on. Yet the other side of the argument is to wonder if a totally clinical and objective portrayal of what happened is equally inappropriate.

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.