display | more...

A form of syllogism in scholastic logic. The name is from a medieval mnemonic poem, where its vowels reflect the syllogism's standard form of AAI-4

All P are M. A - universal affirmative
All M are S. A - universal affirmative
Therefore, some S are P.  I - particular affirmative

Although it works fine in Aristotelian logic, modern logic considers Bramantip invalid because it commits what is called the existential fallacy, where we presuppose that a set has members. The particular affirmative in Bramantip's conclusion is valid only if the classes of the universal premises have members, but it is not necessarily the case that they do. A third premise – that some M exist – is required to make the syllogism a valid rule. 

Other classical syllogisms guilty of the existential fallacy are Darapti, Felapton and Fesapo.


Barbara, Celarent, Darii, Ferio que prioris;
Cesare, Camestres, Festino, Baroko secundae;
Tertia
, Darapti, Disamis, Datisi, Felapton,
Bokardo, Ferison, habet; Quarta in super addit
Bramantip, Camenes, Dimaris, Fesapo, Fresison

Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors.