THE ANTICHRIST
By
Friedrich Nietzsche
Translation: H.L. Mencken
51.
The fact that faith, under certain circumstances, may work for blessedness, but that this blessedness produced by an idee fixe by no means makes the idea it
self true, and the fact that faith actually moves no mountains, but instead raises them up where there were none before: all this is made sufficiently clear by a walk through a lunatic asylum. Not, of course, to a priest: for his instincts prompt him to the lie that sickness is not sickness and lunatic asylums not lunatic asylums.
Christianity finds sickness necessary, just as the Greek
spirit had need of a superabundance of health--the actual ulterior purpose of the whole system of salvation of the church is to make
people ill. And the church it
self--doesn't it set up a Catholic lunatic asylum as the ultimate ideal?--The whole earth as a madhouse?--The sort of
religious man that the church wants is a typical decadent; the moment at which a
religious crisis dominates a
people is always marked by epidemics of nervous disorder; the inner world" of the
religious man is so much like the "inner world" of the overstrung and exhausted that it is difficult to distinguish between them; the "highest" states of mind, held up be fore
mankind by
Christianity as of supreme worth, are actually epileptoid in form--the church has granted the name of holy only to lunatics or to gigantic frauds in majorem dei honorem. . . . Once I ventured to designate the whole
Christian system of training22in penance and salvation (now best studied in England) as a method of producing a folie circulaire upon a soil already prepared for it, which is to say, a soil thoroughly unhealthy. Not every one may be a
Christian: one is not "converted" to
Christianity--one must first be sick enough for it. . . .We others, who have the courage for health and likewise for contempt,--we may well despise a
religion that teaches misunderstanding of the body! that refuses to rid it
self of the superstition about the
soul! that makes a "virtue" of insufficient nourishment! that combats health as a sort of enemy, d
evil, temptation! that persuades it
self that it is possible to carry about a "perfect
soul" in a cadaver of a body, and that, to this end, had to devise for it
self a new concept of "perfection," a pale, sickly, idiotically ecstatic state of existence, so-called "holiness"--a holiness that is it
self merely a series of symptoms of an impoverished, enervated and incurably disordered body! . . . The
Christian movement, as a
European movement, was from the start no more than a general uprising of all sorts of outcast and refuse elements (--who now, under cover of
Christianity, aspire to power)-- It does not represent the decay of a race; it represents, on the contrary, a conglomeration of
decadence products from all directions, crowding together and seeking one another out. It was not, as has been thought, the
corruption of
antiquity, of noble
antiquity, which made
Christianity possible; one cannot too sharply challenge the learned imbecility which today maintains that theory. At the time when the sick and rotten Chandala classes in the whole imperium were
Christianized, the contrary type, the nobility, reached its finest and ripest development. The majority became master; democracy, with its
Christian instincts, triumphed . . .
Christianity was not "national," it was not based on race--it appealed to all the varieties of men disinherited by life, it had its allies everywhere.
Christianity has the rancour of the sick at its very core--the instinct against the healthy, against health. Everything that is well--constituted, proud, gallant and, above all, beautiful gives offence to its ears and eyes. Again I remind you of Paul's priceless saying: "And
God hath chosen the weak things of the world, the foolish things of the world, the base things of the world, and things which are despised":23 this was the formula; in hoc signo the
decadence triumphed.--
God on the cross--is man always to miss the frightful inner significance of this symbol?--Everything that suffers, everything that hangs on the cross, is divine. . . . We all hang on the cross, consequently we are divine. . . . We alone are divine. . . .
Christianity was thus a victory: a nobler attitude of mind was destroyed by it--
Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of
humanity.--