Among the many repugnant ideas promulgated of late by Islamist apologists is the notion that the world's Muslim population has been victimized by the western world and that the unending catalog of sociopathic acts of terror committed in the name of Islam are a legitimate response to this perceived injustice.  Perhaps the most egregious example of this among some American Muslims is the recent attempt to link the modern Islamist movement with the struggle for civil rights by American Blacks.  The connection is historically, culturally and ethically absurd.  In the course of history, Muslims have been the oppressors more often than the oppressed, slavers more often than the enslaved, perpetrators more often than victims. Islam's fundamental discomfort with non-Muslims is inherently racist and the discrimination against non-Muslims has been a historical feature of every society dominated by Islam. Worse yet, this spurious logic is intended to beguile moderate Muslims into embarking on the path to radicalization, and to create a common cause among the western cultural liberals who have a autonomic sympathy with class struggles of any kind. 

Moderate Muslims who have been ostracized and intimidated physically and politically by the Islamists have a legitimate claim to victimization. The majority of Muslims living in the west enjoy the benefits of a pluralistic society and are raising their children within the spiritual and devotional guidelines of Islam.  In the last several decades, this quiet majority has been under attack from radical Islamists promoting Wahhabist, Salafist, & Qutbist ideologies who are forcefully attempting to wrest control of Islam for political and ideological purposes.  This phenomenon has been amply documented by Muslims such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Irshad Manji who have suffered death threats and worse for challenging Islamist ideas.  A moderate Muslim who opposes the Islamist agenda becomes its target.

Many in the West have wondered about the relative paucity of opposition among moderate Muslims at the hijacking of their religion by radical Islamists.  The answer to this is that devotional Muslims who oppose the radicals are intimidated and, afraid.  Unlike the extremists, they practice a spiritual and apolitical devotion to their faith and lack an understanding of the penetration and control that Islamism has gained over the Ummah or world Islamic community.  

Akbar S. Ahmed was formerly the Pakistani high commissioner to Britain and has been on the faculties of Harvard, Princeton and Cambridge.  He is currently the chair of Islamic Studies at American University.  He is a great example of what most non-Muslims would consider an Islamic moderate.  His recent book, Journey into Islam, chronicles his travels throughout the modern Islamic world, with three of his students, in search of trends in modern Islamic thought.  What he finds is profoundly disheartening.  Mr. Ahmet explains in his book the Ummah can be roughly divided into three major categories of Islamic culture: Aligarth, Ajmer and Deoband.  Ajmer represents the peaceful Sufi mysticism that many westerners have historically associated with all of Islam.  Aligarth, represented by Ahmed himself, is the desire to modernize Islam without corrupting it, and Deoband, a product of the 14th century when Islam was under attack by Mongol invaders, represents a rejection of the open acceptance of non-Muslims, the core beliefs of modern Islamists.  In short, he reports  that the mystical and progressive forms of Islam, Aligarth and Ajmer are on the wane and the Islamist radicalism represented by Deoband is aggressively on the rise.

In Mr. Ahmed's words:

"The progressive and active Aligarth model had become enfeebled and in danger of being overtaken by the Deoband model ... I felt like a warrior in the midst of the fray who knew the odds were against him but never quite realized that his side had already lost the war."

As the journalist Tony Blankley notes in his book, The West's Last Chance the Islamists are resourceful and determined. They have adroitly co-opted the rhetoric and ideological tactics of the extreme left, but their agenda is more fascist than socialist. Their goals have been clearly and repeatedly stated.  What they seek is a world wide Islamic state embodied in the restoration of the Caliphate which would rule under Sharia law.

The Christian Science Monitor's, James Brandon reporting from Amman, Jordan sums it up this way:

The three middle-aged men sitting in an Indian restaurant in Jordan's capital scarcely look like Islamic revolutionaries. They are smartly dressed in Western-style suits and sip thoughtfully from cans of Pepsi as they share their plan to reshape the Muslim world. "President Bush says that we want to enslave people and oppress their freedom of speech," says Abu Abdullah, a senior member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation. "But we want to free all people from being slaves of men and make them slaves of Allah. Hizb ut-Tahrir says that Muslims should abolish national boundaries within the Islamic world and return to a single Islamic state, known as "the Caliphate," that would stretch from Indonesia to Morocco and contain more than 1.5 billion people."

When an impressionable and idealistic young Muslim voices something like the following, "If I were to talk freely I would say that I want an Islamic state, that I hope one day to see Britain or the US be a Muslim country,"  he no doubt imagines an earthly paradise where spirituality reigns and the corruption and excesses of modern Western society are absent.  Unfortunately, the harsh reality of life in every Islamic state throughout the course of history has been one of grotesque inequality, brutal repression and almost unimaginably barbaric despotism.  The following quote from a recent article in USA Today hammers home the reality of Sharia Law.

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — The Saudi judiciary on Tuesday defended a court verdict that sentenced a 19-year-old victim of a gang rape to six months in jail and 200 lashes because she was with an unrelated male when they were attacked. The Shiite Muslim woman had initially been sentenced to 90 lashes after being convicted of violating Saudi Arabia's rigid Islamic law requiring segregation of the sexes. But in considering her appeal of the verdict, the Saudi General Court increased the punishment. It also roughly doubled prison sentences for the seven men convicted of raping the woman, Saudi news media said last week. The reports triggered an international outcry over the Saudis punishing the victim of a terrible crime. But the Ministry of Justice stood by the verdict Tuesday, saying that "charges were proven" against the woman for having been in a car with a man who was not her relative.

Another, more recent example of Islamist barbarity:

Mentally Disabled Women Used in Bombings
By STEVEN R. HURST
Associated Press Writer
BAGHDAD (AP) -- Two women described as mentally disabled and strapped with remote-control explosives - and possibly used as unwitting suicide bombers - brought carnage Friday to two pet bazaars, killing at least 91 people in the deadliest day since Washington flooded the capital with extra troops last spring. Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, Iraq's chief military spokesman in Baghdad, said the women had Down syndrome and may not have known they were on suicide missions, but gave no further details on how authorities pieced together the evidence. He also said the bombs were detonated by remote control.

So, what's the answer to this dilemma?  Clearly there's no one answer, but M. Zuhdi Jasser, a former U.S. Navy lieutenant commander and the president and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, offers the following wise words as a recipe for turning the Ummah in a more productive direction:

I was raised to appreciate American freedom which guaranteed my right to life, liberty, and the practice of my personal faith of Islam, like in no so-called Muslim country. My grandfather used to talk about how the devastation of Syria brought by the military coups and the Baathists, and ultimately by Hafez Assad, was allowed to happen because moderate freedom-loving Syrians abandoned the military to the thugs, who ultimately repeatedly savaged the country, before entrenching the Assad family despots for generations.

I have always been a devout practicing Muslim maintaining a central personal spiritual relationship with God in my life. I have also held true to the importance of spiritual practices in my life including fasting, daily prayer, scriptural recitation, charity, community worship, and personal integrity. As a result, I have often been asked by the local communities in which I have lived, to speak about Islam, its role in my life, and my understanding of its history. Well, before 9/11, in the 1980s, as I found myself frustrated by the politicization of many but not all of the Muslim communities in which I participated, I began to focus on the main problem I experienced — the harmful impact of political Islam upon the practice of Islam in America.

A moral, pluralistic, spiritual Islam is the only way to defeat Islamofascism. We saw with the London plots this summer, perpetrated by Muslim physicians, that this ideology utilizes terror as a tactic to achieve fascistic political ends blind to the professional training or level of education of the individual foot soldiers. The ends which these militants seek, is a warped, utopian dream of a caliphate or some form of so-called Islamic state, which imposes their despotic theocratic interpretation of Islamic law upon citizens. The Nazis had physicians and professionals of all walks of life helping them to commit genocide against the Jews through a supremacist dehumanization of their enemies — true fascism. So too do militant Islamists dehumanize their enemies (anti-Islamists) and exact their barbaric punishments upon innocents in an evil torn right out of the pages of every fascist regime in history.

Our only task is to live free....of religious extremism


Relevant Links

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-11-20-saudi-rape_N.htm?csp=34

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0510/p01s04-wome.html

http://www.aifdemocracy.org/