It could be said that
electronic music is far enough
away from other forms of music that it could be
called a different
medium altogether. Let's see what
Marshall has to say, (
btw, this was written in
1964):
(the difference between automation and older industrialization) "is, as compared with the older machines, the difference between an oboe in an orchestra and the same tone on an electronic music instrument. With the electronic music instrument, any tone can be made available in any intensity and for any length of time. Note that the older symphony orchestra was, by comparison, a machine of separate instruments that gave the effect of organic unity. With the electronic instrument, one starts with organic unity as an immediate fact of perfect synchronization. This makes the attempt to create the effect of organic unity quite pointless.
Electronic music must seek other goals."
from Understanding Media.
So
true.
Whereas one is
confined with other musical instruments to the
role of a
unit in a mass, and makes a
relatively small
range of sound, the
synthesizer and effects
processor open up a
massive new range of sound.
So what's the
BIG difference between
electronic music and other forms of music?
Well, as a medium, electronic music allows the
composer a
greater
creative freedom, having a much fuller range of
sound to
select from. This permits a much more
intuitive method of com
position. Electronic music
therefore, requires much more
listener
participation, and has as-yet-
mostly-un
charted
potential to be more
emotive than music has ever been before.
That's why I like it.
and no, I'm not talking about techno.