Sorry
DMan, but the
Sendero Luminoso wished to be responsible for the
siege in the
Japanese embassy back in 1996 (and beginning of 1997) because of all the publicity. However, it was the
MRTA: Moviemento Revolutionario de
Tupac Amaru, and the
terrorists were
executed without any form of trial.
First of all, don't get me wrong, I don't agree with their activities, but I can
imagine why they use
violence. uhmmm, let me phrase this different: I don't know what I would do if I was growing up and living up there in the
Andes.
Violence is something you use when you run out of
arguments before having said something. Normally. But what if you're not allowed to say something? What if, when you do say something that isn't
positive about the
government, get
killed? What if your
family members show clear signs of
malnutrition? What if there's no good
health security,
education etc
in your region of the country...???
I don't think there is a clear and firm line between "the
good guys vs. the
bad guys". It's easier to
judge/
misjudge(?) when sitting and relaxing with the
prejudices in a comfi-chair in a rich
First World country.
The
actions by the Sendero Luminoso in the
eighties did make a
difference: e.g. there are more
schools,
vaccination programs, and
villages get
electricity. IIRC, the
political actions of the Sendero Luminoso are in a
dormant state, and "other" activities involve
drug trafficking, and indeed, taking over villages in the
selva (
Tingo Maria and it's region).