A group for Canadians, those who like to node Canadiana, and those who just realize that Canada is cool.


Venerable members of this group:

Aerobe, JD$, Palpz, Altusmens, Senso, Lord Brawl@, Oolong@+, Mark Forest, CanuckErrant, unfettered, RPGeek, grundoon, graceness, hamster bong, fortheloveofgod, hapax, Red Deer Smith, chebucto, Whiskeydaemon, visual_dichotomy, Rapscallion, Tempestas, schizophasic, RustyLark
This group of 24 members is led by Aerobe

Degrassi began with a low-budget after-school show for kiddies and gradually grew into one of the most successful and recognizable Canadian television franchises. For three decades, various incarnations of the show have spun relatively intelligent stories and morality tales about adolescence—- with, of course, a study guide available to help examine relevant issues.

I will discuss each series and related topics. Other nodes provide additional detail.

The Kids of Degrassi Street (1979-1985)

Linda Schuyler, a former teacher, and Kit Hood, an actor and filmmaker, formed Playing with Time productions in 1975, and had their first major success with this show, clearly modeled on the American After-School Special. The major innovation in this series, which ran twenty-six episodes between 1979 and 1985, was the use of a common setting (real-life De Grassi Street in Toronto, Ontario) and recurring characters. The episodes dealt with childhood issues and proved popular with children and educators. The show looks and feels low-budget, but the child actors have a believability and sincerity usually missing from television, even in the era of "Reality" tv. The later actors include many who would continue with the Degrassi franchise. They play different characters here, however, than the ones they would make famous. This, combined with the cheapness and pedestrian approach makes Kids one of the least-watched of the Degrassi series.

By the series' end, the youngest actors were now nearing an age to attend Junior High. The Degrassi story really begins there.

Degrassi Junior High (1987-1989)

Wake up in the morning, feeling shy and lonely,
Gee, I gotta go to school.
I don't think I can make it, don't think I can take it,
I wonder what I'm gonna do.
But when I look around and see,
that someone is smiling right at me,
Wait! That someone’s talkin' to me,
Hey! I got a new friend!
--Lewis Manne and Wendy Watson Destiny Fellows

If anything indicates that Playing with Time (a) saw this as a kid/youth show and (b) was founded by a teacher, it's the Cheesiest Theme Song in Television History, part of which I've quoted above. It sounds like something you'd teach to a kindergarten class, provided you could tolerate their cynical smirking. Never mind. Once you get over the rinky tune and Romper Room lyrics, you see a show that, for the most part, doesn't patronize its intended audience. For that reason, Degrassi won critical acclaim and a huge audience.

Unlike most American high school offerings, Degrassi cast actual teenagers as teenagers, eschewed simplistic high school stereotypes, and allowed issues episodes to resolve. It also dedicated much of its time to the more mundane aspects of teen life, which made it seem less sensationalist than it might have. While eighth-graders Spike (Amanda Steptoe) and Shane (Billy Parrott) have sex, Yick (Siluck Saysanasy)and Melanie (Sara Ballingall) fumble towards an innocent first date. L.D. (Amanda Cook) worries her ill father will die, while a non-poisonous snake gets loose in the halls with comical consequences.

The show reflects diversity in its casting. Characters not only come from different racial backgrounds, they have wildly different home lives. In one episode, Lucy (Anais Granofsky) and friends get drunk and behave irresponsibly with little consequence. In that same episode, model daughter Voula (Niki Kemeny) sneaks out to a dance and gets in deep trouble with her conservative, immigrant parents.

The first season begins with seventh graders; in the second, they move on to eighth grade while new, younger actors join the cast. No one realized how popular and long-running the show would become, and the failure to plan ahead created some minor but bizarre continuity problems. After the second season, the original cast should have graduated and moved on. Instead, an unexplained population/enrollment problem has them attending ninth grade at Degrassi, though taking some of their classes at nearby Borden High. A year later, however, all of the cast, and some of the established Borden crowd, continue at the hitherto unmentioned Degrassi High.

Degrassi High (1989-1992)

The song receives some new lyrics and becomes marginally less cheesy. The characters, however, grow and change in believable and unexpected ways. Yick, an insecure nerd in Junior High, drifts away from his old friends and becomes a stoner. Another character commits suicide, leaving behind confused friends. While favourite teacher Ms. Avery (Michelle Goodeve) disappears, the end of the first episode reveals that hardline Dan Raditch (Dan Woods) has been promoted to principal of Degrassi High, a position he will hold in later incarnations of the show.

Despite the size of the cast, we see different sides of a character. Kathleen (Rebecca Haines), say, is not just the girl with the alcoholic mother. She plays various roles in various episodes. While friendships and cliques exist, Degrassi acknowledges the fluidity of social groupings in high school.

The issues grow more serious, and they rarely do mere walk-ons. Only gay and lesbian issues receive short shrift. A teacher is rumoured to be gay in an episode of Junior High, but this remains unconfirmed. Caitlin (Stacie Mistysyn) briefly thinks she might be gay, but she isn't, and the real issue of that episode is that some people experience uncertainty about sexual orientation during adolescence and shouldn't worry about it unduly. When High finally introduces a gay character, he takes the form of Snake's (Stefan Brogren) over-achieving older brother, who makes a guest appearance and is neither seen nor heard from again, not even in the gay-positive Next Generation.

Degrassi: School's Out (1992)

The kids receive a send-off with this tv movie that begins at graduation and ends at the wedding of Simon (Michael Carry) and Alexa (Irene Courakos)-- who, in a plot filled with teen sex, have saved their virginity for the honeymoon. In between we see the events of the summer, with the focus on the show's most popular characters.

School's Out in Canada and on DVD dropped both the f-bomb and Joey Jeremiah's (Pat Mastroianni's) pants1. Viewers in America and some later Canadian rebroadcasts saw a censored version. The film also features far-reaching implications for some characters, implications which would be addressed in the twenty-first century.

Degrassi Talks (1992)

The other least-watched of the Degrassi shows, this limited run series features the actors as themselves talking to other teens and experts about issues discussed in episodes of Junior High and High.

Degrassi: The Next Generation (2001-2009)

Whatever it takes
I know i can make it through
--Jody Colero, James McGrath, Stephen Stohn

With Emma (Miriam Mcdonald), the child born to Christine "Spike" Nelson now old enough to be in Junior High, the show returned. Both the Junior High and the High School were replaced with Degrassi Community School, a composite center that educated students from seventh to twelfth grade.

The pilot episode also served as a reunion special. The show's creators carefully crafted three different plot threads. One plot reintroduces many of the old characters as they attend a reunion, thus establishing the connection between the new and the old series. Another introduces the adolescent Emma and a few of her friends in a somewhat far-fetched encounter with a sexual predator2. A third, somewhat disconnected series of short scenes updates us on other members of the original series. All told, the original pilot runs one and one-half hours (including commercials). That third thread, which requires prior knowledge of the characters to be meaningful, was removed from syndication and series DVD release. This turns "Mother and Child Reunion" into two half-hour episodes which can be enjoyed by fans who have no real connection with the original characters.

Baby Emma and mother Christine/Spike are not the only connections to the old school.3 Archie "Snake" Simpson reappears as a teacher, and eventually marries Christine, on whom he once had a teenage crush. The adult Caitlin Ryan and Joey Jeremiah reappear, and become series regulars for a time. Other characters turn up, especially in the third and fourth seasons, and for the wedding of Snake and Spike. Emma meets her brain-damaged father. Derek "Wheels" Wheeler (Neil Hope) seeks absolution for events in School's Out. Mr. Raditch continues as principal for the first three seasons, before being replaced by the imperious Ms. Hazilakos (Melissa DiMarco) and, later still, the jack-asinine Mr. Sheppard (Kevin Jubinville). Unlike the earlier show, The Next Generation dedicates plots to the parents and teachers, though the teens remain the center, and the trouble they find is often greater than anything their predecessors experienced.

Ratcheting up the issues and their frequency makes the show seem, to some, edgier, but it also becomes more sensationalist. No school goes through quite as many significant and newsworthy problems as the Next Generation version of Degrassi experiences. A Hollywood movie uses their school as a location. A school shooting leaves one character in a wheelchair, while a stabbing at a party kills a fan favourite. One episode gives some credibility to the sex bracelet urban legend of the early 2000s, though in a form modified significantly so as to seem almost plausible.4

Degrassi: The Next Generation also goes out of its way to make amends for the limited handling of gay and lesbian issues in the original series. The Next Generation features a character with a gay father, a gay male teen character (hip Marco, played by Adamo Ruggiero), and a regular boyfriend for that character. A female character, Alex (Deanna Casaluce), discovers her lesbianism in the fifth season and, in the most surprising twist, trendy queen bitch/cheerleader Paige (Lauren Collins) realizes she is bisexual.5 The significant number of gay characters isn't just something that drew criticism from real-life gospel slingers. Within the show, evangelical Christian characters express offense and, if the show clearly takes sides at that point, at least it acknowledges that differences of opinion exist. More significantly, episodes deal with gay bashing and homophobia, while others show that among many teens today, the sexual preferences of others is simply not an issue.

The new incarnation proved more popular than the original, perhaps at the cost of some verisimilitude. Not only was it more sensationalized, it was glitzier. The realistic-looking teens, perhaps aware of their predecessors' limited post-Degrassi success, grew increasingly buff and made-up as the seasons progressed. The scripts also demonstrated a self-awareness that could be entertaining, but was not strictly realistic.

Degrassi Knoll

The show, in the post-postmodern tradition of contemporary television, often references its own history and influences. Starting with the second season, episodes bear the titles of pop songs from the 1980s, when the original show became popular. One third season episode self-consciously borrows the plot from The Breakfast Club. Principal Raditch dresses in similar clothing to the administrator from that John Hughes classic. The weird girl, as in the movie, chooses to be in detention, though for a different (and more plausible) reason than her Breakfast Club counterpart. Degrassi also answers a lingering question from the movie. Yes, the kids do say "hi" to each other in the halls the following week. Of course, Degrassi always did take a more positive yet often more realistic approach to teen interactions.

Perhaps the series' most bizarre bit of intertextuality concerns filmmaker Kevin Smith.

Smith is a huge fan. He references Degrassi in several of his films, and has openly discussed his youthful crush on Stacie Mistysyn who plays Caitlin Ryan. In four episodes of The Next Generation, he appears as himself, first filming on location at the school and then visiting Toronto for the premiere of the fictitious movie, Jay and Silent Bob Go Canadian, Eh?6 While there, he meets and experiences a short-lived romance with the now-adult Caitlin.

The show's self-aware sense of humour may also be seen in the online "Degrassi Minis," short clips which often put cast members in non-canonical situations that kid their characters, and in two tongue-in-cheek, out-of-continuity Halloween episodes which parody horror movies.

The show continued in 2008, with Emma and her classmates poised to graduate high school (seemingly a year too late, a fact accounted for by placing the last two seasons in separate semesters). Other characters have graduated, yet still appear in storylines that follow their lives. The show, however, has exhausted the issue-oriented approach and now seems to be flogging the dead horse's bare bones. The 2008 and 2009 seasons have their share of silly, far-fetched, and excessively sensationalist elements. The series continued nevertheless.

Paradise City: Degrassi Goes Hollywood (2009)

This bizarre tv-movie gave a send-off to the original Next Generation kids, who had either left the show or were working their way off it. Several members of the cast, through a series of implausible twists and fantastic coincidences, all end up in Hollywood. Although it has its fans, I could only view it as largely humorless self-parody.

Made-for-television movies which may or may not be referenced in the regular series have, by now, become a standard part of Degrassi.

Degrassi (2010-2015)

Starting with its tenth season in 2010, Degrassi switched to a daily soap opera format, dropped its subtitles and the pretense of realism. The new show mixes elements of the original with Gossip Girls excesses, and may be unrecognizable to fans of old Degrassi. It continues with new students cycling in and replacing old. Since I have not watched in years, I do not know if older characters reappear any more.

Degrassi: Next Class 2015-2022

Degrassi changed its name to "Next Class" in 2015. The longevity of the new format is, I admit, impressive. It lasted until 2022.

Degrassi: The Morality Tale

Drama requires conflict and consequences, and the Kids of Degrassi experience those on a weekly basis. More often than not, the teens of Degrassi learn harsh lessons.

Spike has unprotected sex once and gets pregnant. Erica (Angela Deiseach) has protected sex and gets pregnant anyway. She has an abortion, only to be stalked by a rabid anti-abortionist. Dwayne (Darrin Brown) has unprotected sex and contracts HIV. Wheels buys condoms— and the saleswoman turns out to be his date's mother. Shane takes hallucinogenic drugs, does a brodie off a bridge, and permanently damages his brain. Wheels drives drunk, kills a child, and leaves a classmate disabled. Emma gives a boy oral sex and contracts an STD. Terri (Christina Schmidt) foolishly gives her abusive boyfriend one more chance and ends up in intensive care. Manny (Cassie Steele) flashes her breasts and finds them posted online. Devout Darcy (Shenae Grimes) takes her first alcoholic drink and someone spikes it with a date rape drug.

As with the fact of major issues, the consequences create problems. Individually, these stories are entirely plausible and they provide fodder for discussion among teens and adults. Many of the situations depicted happen in teens' lives, often with exactly the consequences depicted. Pregnancy often results from sex. Returning to an abusive partner easily could land you in intensive care. Collectively, however, the issues and their consequences amount to overkill. Degrassi is simultaneously a happy place and yet one visited by every conceivable teen issue (including a school shooting and a murder) on a weekly basis. It's a world where any teen issue and lifestyle can be explored, but where an angry god visits judgment upon every transgression.

I have a love-hate relationship with the show. The excesses regularly drive me away from watching, and yet I always return. Degrassi remains far superior to nearly every teen-based, teen-oriented offering on television.

Fans clearly agree, because the show has proven profitable in its various incarnations.

Degrassi: The Merchandising

Degrassi has spawned a fair bit of merchandise. This includes Exit Stage Left, a novel set during Junior High's first season, and several short novels that each focus on a specific character. The Next Generation has an accompanying series of "Extra Credit" graphic novels that fill in the gaps between episodes.

All episodes and incarnations, of course, may be purchased. The series most famous product may be, of course, rapper Drake, who first came to attention as the Degrassi character Jimmy Brooks. Clearly, Degrassi will remain for some time part of the Canadian popgeist, and one of the country's most successful dramatic exports.



1. Actually, this is the second time viewers are treated to wise-ass Joey Jeremiah's bare butt, but this time, it appears in a sexualized context. The movie also features the words "shit" and "asshole," hitherto unspoken in the series but obviously part of the average Canadian teen’s dialect.

2. The fact of the online predator isn't far-fetched, but the manner in which the cast prevent Emma's violation reeks of TV writing.

3. In some markets where Degrassi is known primarily through The Next Generation, the original series has been rebroadcast as Degrassi: Old School.

4. The original urban legend claims that teens perform sexual acts with anyone who snaps a bracelet, with the particular act indicated by the bracelet's colour. In the Degrassi-verse, offering someone a bracelet of a particular colour meant you were willing to engage in that act with them. This allowed the show to indicate oral sex was about to occur between very young characters without having those actors do things that (a) shouldn't be shown in a show watched by children and (b)couldn't be performed by the actors without violating laws against child pornography.

5. The show was not above lesbian exploitation, and not just because Paige and Alex date and even exploit the male fascination with girl-girl relationships in order to enter a trendy, age-restricted event. In a sixth season episode, Alex briefly dances as a stripper in order to acquire much-needed money.

6. Jason Mewes and Alanis Morissette also appear in these episodes as themselves, actors in Smith's movie.

070xl5kVBMQk99xiyhn^

In its best-known time on television, Royal Canadian Air Farce was a group of comedians that consisted of John Morgan, Luba Goy, Don Ferguson and Roger Abbott as main performers, with Dave Broadfoot making special appearances every now and then, and Rick Olsen and Gord Holtam as writers. The first incarnation of the group, however, appeared in Montreal in 1970 as the improvisational stage theatre group known as The Jest Society, originally composed of John Morgan, Martin Bronstein, Patrick Conlon, Gay Claitman and Roger Abbott. By January of 1971, Mr. Conlon and Mr. Claitman had left the group and Ms. Goy and Mr. Ferguson had joined. With Mr. Broadfoot's appearance in 1973, the group as most people are familiar with it was formed and was named Royal Canadian Air Farce.

The group's first radio performance was on Dec. 9, 1973, on CBC Radio, and its television show first aired on CBC Television in October of 1980 as a one-hour special. The show ranked No. 2 for the week (behind Hockey Night in Canada), leading to CBC requesting 10 more episodes to be aired weekly. A change in CBC Television management led to Air Farce leaving television until 1992, when the group produced "1992 Year of the Farce" on New Year's Eve of 1992 and sold it to CBC Television. The episode was a success, and the first episode of the Air Farce television show that most viewers are familiar with -- complete with the opening theme composed by the Barenaked Ladies -- aired on Oct. 8, 1993.

Air Farce's four core performers are best known for their political satire and deadpan delivery in addition to sheer goofiness, and among the most well-known characters played by them are the following.

The show continues to this day on its 12th season, only without Mr. Morgan, who passed away on Nov. 15, 2004, and with the addition of Jessica Holmes, Craig Lauzon and Alan Park.

Source
www.airfarce.com

The longest undefended border in the world, 5,525 miles (8900 km) long. Citizens of the United States and Canada may cross the border between their countries freely without a passport, stopping only for customs inspections. It wasn't always that way; it took 150 years of wars, treaties, and diplomatic wrangling to achieve this supreme symbol of international amity.

The principal cause of the 1755-1763 French and Indian War was control of territory between New France and Great Britain's colonies in North America. Great Britain, having defeated the French, received all of New France. King George III issued a Proclamation organizing his new domain:

"The Government of Quebec bounded on the Labrador Coast by the River St. John, and from thence by a Line drawn from the Head of that River through the Lake St. John, to the South end of the Lake Nipissim; from whence the said Line, crossing the River St. Lawrence, and the Lake Champlain, in 45. Degrees of North Latitude, passes along the High Lands which divide the Rivers that empty themselves into the said River St. Lawrence from those which fall into the Sea; and also along the North Coast of the Baye des Chaleurs, and the Coast of the Gulph of St. Lawrence to Cape Rosieres, and from thence crossing the Mouth of the River St. Lawrence by the West End of the Island of Anticosti, terminates at the aforesaid River of St. John."1

In order to enact the Proclamation of 1763, Valentine and Collins surveyed a boundary between New York and the newly-acquired Quebec, assumed to be the 45th parallel as the proclamation specified. The 45th parallel was mentioned again in the 1774 Quebec Act:

.."bounded on the south by a line from the bay of Chaleurs, along the high lands which divide the rivers that empty themselves into the river Saint Lawrence from those which fall into the sea, to a point in forty-five degrees of northern latitude, on the eastern bank of the river Connecticut, keeping the same latitude directly west, through the lake Champlain, until, in the same latitude, it meets the river Saint Lawrence; from thence up the eastern bank of the said river to the lake Ontario; thence through the lake Ontario, and the river commonly called Niagara; and thence along by the eastern and south-eastern bank of lake Erie, following the said bank, until the same shall be intersected by the northern boundary, granted by the charter of the province of Pensylvania, in case the same shall be so intersected; and from thence along the said northern and western boundaries of the said province, until the said western boundary strike the Ohio: but in case the said bank of the said lake shall not be found to be so intersected, then following the said bank until it shall arrive at that point of the said bank which shall be nearest to the north-western angle of the said province of Pensylvania; and thence, by a right line, to the said north-western angle of the said province; and thence along the western boundary of the said province, until it strike the river Ohio; and along the bank of the said river, westward, to the banks of the Mississippi..."2

The Quebec Act was one of the Intolerable Acts passed by Parliament as punishment for the Boston Tea Party; Quebec was extended down to the Ohio River. Relations between Great Britain and its colonies only got worse, resulting in the American Revolution.

The 1783 Treaty of Paris, which ended the Revolutionary War, set the borders of the new United States, the northern portion of which was:

"...from the northwest angle of Nova Scotia, viz., that angle which is formed by a line drawn due north from the source of St. Croix River to the highlands; along the said highlands which divide those rivers that empty themselves into the river St. Lawrence, from those which fall into the Atlantic Ocean, to the northwesternmost head of Connecticut River; thence down along the middle of that river to the forty-fifth degree of north latitude; from thence by a line due west on said latitude until it strikes the river Iroquois or Cataraquy3; thence along the middle of said river into Lake Ontario; through the middle of said lake until it strikes the communication by water between that lake and Lake Erie; thence along the middle of said communication into Lake Erie, through the middle of said lake until it arrives at the water communication between that lake and Lake Huron; thence along the middle of said water communication into Lake Huron, thence through the middle of said lake to the water communication between that lake and Lake Superior; thence through Lake Superior northward of the Isles Royal and Phelipeaux to the Long Lake; thence through the middle of said Long Lake and the water communication between it and the Lake of the Woods, to the said Lake of the Woods; thence through the said lake to the most northwesternmost point thereof, and from thence on a due west course to the river Mississippi..."4

The only problem was, this description was a fantasy. Most of the area along this border was uninhabited, and its geography was poorly understood. Many of the landmarks described in the treaty simply didn't exist: There is no "water communication" between Lake Superior and the Lake of The Woods, The Mississippi River doesn't go far enough north to draw a line west from the Lake of the Woods to meet it. Further East, Massachusetts and Nova Scotia Brunswick couldn't agree which river was the St. Croix River! A former approximation of the border can be seen in the county boundaries of New Brunswick.

Anyway, the British didn't respect this treaty too well, keeping troops stationed in Detroit and Chicago, and assisting Chief Pontiac in his uprising. It wasn't until war with Revolutionary France strained Britain's military ability that they decided to buy the United States's neutrality. The product of this was the 1794 Jay Treaty. This attempted to resolve some of the boundary disputes:

..."Whereas it is uncertain whether the river Mississippi extends so far to the northward as to be intersected by a line to be drawn due west from the Lake of the Woods, in the manner mentioned in the treaty of peace between His Majesty and the United States: it is agreed that measures shall be taken in concert between His Majesty's Government in America and the Government of the United States, for making a joint survey of the said river from one degree of latitude below the falls of St. Anthony, to the principal source or sources of the said river, and also of the parts adjacent thereto; and that if, on the result of such survey, it should appear that the said river would not be intersected by such a line as is above mentioned, the two parties will thereupon proceed, by amicable negotiation, to regulate the boundary line in that quarter, as well as all other points to be adjusted between the said parties5..."

"...Whereas doubts have arisen what river was truly intended under the name of the river St. Croix, mentioned in the said treaty of peace, and forming a part of the boundary therein described; that question shall be referred to the final decision of commissioners to be appointed...The said Commissioners shall, by a declaration, under their hands and seals, decide what river is the river St. Croix, intended by the treaty. The said declaration shall contain a description of the said river, and shall particularize the latitude and longitude of its mouth and of its source.6"

But this was the one article of the Jay Treaty that was not to be fully realized. The commissioners appointed found that surveying in the far northern Appalachian Mountains wasn't practical, and so a 1798 treaty let them off the hook, stating
"...the Commissioners appointed under the fifth article of the above mentioned treaty shall not be obliged to particularize in their description, the latitude and longitude of the source of the river which may be found to be the one truly intended in the aforesaid treaty of peace under the name of the river St. Croix, but they shall be at liberty to describe the said river, in such other manner as they may judge expedient, which description shall be considered as a complete execution of the duty required of the said Commissioners in this respect by the article aforesaid. And to the end that no uncertainty may hereafter exist on this subject, it is further agreed, that as soon as may be after the decision of the said Commissioners, measures shall be concerted between the Government of the United States and His Britannic Majesty's Governors or Lieutenant Governors in America, in order to erect and keep in repair a suitable monument at the place ascertained and described to be the source of the said river St. Croix7..."

The 1814 Treaty of Ghent8 ending the War of 1812 set up several boards of commissioners to

  • decide who possessed "the several Islands in the Bay of Passamaquoddy, which is part of the Bay of Fundy, and the Island of Grand Menan in the said Bay of Fundy"
  • figure out the northern end of the line due north from the Source of the St Croix, and survey the entire boundary of New England and New York to the Saint Lawrence River. The survey line of the 45th Parallel turned out not to have been done very precisely, transferring slivers of territory between Vermont, New York, and Quebec.
  • decide who owned islands in Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and the Niagara River.
  • clarify the border west from Sault Ste Marie to the Lake of the Woods.

While the commissioners were doing their work, another treaty was drawn up, dealing with the boundary further west. The Convention of 1818 states:

"It is agreed that a Line drawn from the most North Western Point of the Lake of the Woods, along the forty Ninth Parallel of North Latitude, or, if the said Point shall not be in the Forty Ninth Parallel of North Latitude, then that a Line drawn from the said Point due North or South as the Case may be, until the said Line shall intersect the said Parallel of North Latitude, and from the Point of such Intersection due West along and with the said Parallel shall be the Line of Demarcation between the Territories of the United States, and those of His Britannic Majesty, and that the said Line shall form the Northern Boundary of the said Territories of the United States, and the Southern Boundary of the Territories of His Britannic Majesty, from the Lake of the Woods to the Stony Mountains.9"

Here is the first mention of the 49th Parallel as a border, even thought the diplomats still needed a geography lesson. The United States gave up a slice of the Louisiana Territory and Great Britain gave up the upper valley of the Red River of the North.

The northern boundary of Maine was still in dispute. When New Brunswick lumbermen entered Aroostook County in 1838 to cut logs over the winter, a Federal land agent was sent to expel them. Instead of going to cut trees somewhere else, the lumberjacks imprisoned him. New Brunswick and Maine mobilized their militias and it looked as if a war was in the offing. The result of the "Aroostook War" was the Webster-Ashburton Treaty of 1842:

"...Beginning at the monument at the source of the river St. Croix, as designated and agreed to by the Commissioners under the fifth article of the Treaty of 1794, between the Governments of the United States and Great Britain; thence, north, following the exploring line run and marked by the Surveyors of the two Governments in the years 1817 and 1818, under the fifth article of the Treaty of Ghent to its intersection with the river St. John, and to the middle of the channel thereof: thence, up the middle of the main channel of the said river St. John, to the mouth of the river St. Francis; thence up the middle of the channel of the said river St. Francis, and of the lakes through which it flows, to the outlet of the Lake Pohenagamook; thence, southwesterly, in a straight line to a point on the northwest branch of the river St. John, which point shall be ten miles distant from the main branch of the St. John, in a straight line, and in the nearest direction; but if the said point shall be found to be less than seven miles from the nearest point of the summit or crest of the highlands that divide those rivers which empty themselves into the river Saint Lawrence from those which fall into the river Saint John, then the said point shall be made to recede down the said northwest branch of the river se John, to a point seven miles in a straight line from the said summit or crest; thence, in a straight line, in a course about south eight degrees west, to the point where the parallel of latitude of 46°25' north, intersects the southwest branch of the St. John's; thence, southerly, by the said branch, to the source thereof in the highlands at the Metjarmette Portage; thence, down along the said highlands which divide the waters which empty themselves into the river Saint Lawrence from those which fall into the Atlantic Ocean, to the head of Hall's Stream; thence, down the middle of said Stream, till the line thus run intersects the old line of boundary surveyed and marked by Valentine and Collins previously to the year 1774, as the 45th degree of north latitude, and which has been known and understood to be the line of actual division between the States of New York and Vermont on one side, and the British Province of Canada, west along the said dividing line as heretofore known and understood, to the Iroquois or St. Lawrence river10."

The treaty also defined the northern boundaries of Michigan and Minnesota:

"It is moreover agreed, that from the place where the joint Commissioners terminated their labors under the sixth article of the Treaty of Ghent, to wit: at a point in the Neebish Channel, near Muddy Lake, the line shall run into and along the ship channel between Saint Joseph and St. Tammany Islands, to the division of the channel at or near the head of St. Joseph's Island; thence, turning eastwardly and northwardly, around the lower end of St. George's or Sugar Island, and following the middle of the channel which divides St. George's from St. Joseph's Island; thence, up the east Neebish channel, nearest to St. George's Island, through the middle of Lake George; -thence, west of Jonas' Island, into St. Mary's river, to a point in the middle of that river, about one mile above St. George's or Sugar Island, so as to appropriate and assign the said Island to the United States; thence, adopting the line traced on the maps by the Commissioners, thro' the river St. Mary and Lake Superior, to a point north of Ile Royale in said Lake, one hundred yards to the north and east of Ile Chapeau, which last mentioned Island lies near the northeastern point of Ile Royale, where the line marked by the Commissioners terminates; and from the last mentioned point, southwesterly, through the middle of the Sound between Ile Royale and the northwestern mainland, to the mouth of Pigeon river, and up the said river to, and through, the north and South Fowl Lakes, to the Lakes of the height of land between Lake Superior and the Lake of the Woods; thence, along the water-communication to Lake Saisaginaga, and through that Lake; thence, to and through Cypress Lake, Lac du Bois Blanc, Lac la Croix, Little Vermilion Lake, and Lake Namecan, and through the several smaller lakes, straights, or streams, connecting the lakes here mentioned, to that point in Lac la Pluie, or Rainy Lake, at the Chaudiere falls, from which the Commissioners traced the line to the most northwestern point of the Lake of the Woods,-thence, along the said line to the said most northwestern point, being in latitude 49° 23'55" north, and in longitude 95°14'38" west from the Observatory at Greenwich; thence, according to existing treaties, due south to its intersection with the 49th parallel of north latitude, and along that parallel to the Rocky Mountains.11"

Notice that the border of New York and Vermont is no longer the 45th parallel, but the inaccurate Valentine-Collins Line.

The Webster-Ashburton Treaty disposed of most of the disputes along the U.S.'s northern border, but not all of them. At the time, the U.S. and Great Britain had joint control of the Oregon Country, territory west of the Rocky Mountains but north of California. This wasn't working out to well. In 1844, after Andrew Jackson decided he didn't like the other contenders, the Democratic Party nominated a "dark horse" as its Presidential candidate: a Tennessee congressman by the name of James K. Polk. Polk was not very well known, but he was committed to the notion of manifest destiny. He decided that demanding all of Oregon (as well as Texas) would help him get elected. This uncompromising position (Fifty-four Forty or Fight!) helped Polk get enough votes to beat the Great Compromiser, Henry Clay.

Annexing Texas meant war with Mexico, and annexing all of Oregon meant war with Great Britain. So Polk proposed extending the 49th Parallel boundary west to the Pacific. The British eventually accepted, with one minor adjustment: They would not give up the southern tip of Vancouver Island. The 1846 Oregon Treaty states:

"...From the point of the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude, where the boundary laid down in existing treaties and conventions between the United States and Great Britain terminates, the line of boundary between the territories of the United States and those of her Britannic Majesty shall be continued westward along the said forty-ninth parallel of north latitude to the middle of the channel which separates the continent from Vancouver's Island, and thence southerly through the middle of the said channel, and of Fuca's Straits, to the Pacific Ocean12..."

1867 held two important events for the boundary: the Canada Act creating the Dominion of Canada as well as William Seward's purchase of Alaska from Russia. An 1825 Treaty between Russia and Great Britain had set the border of Alaska, but as we have seen before, the two parties disputed what the treaty actually meant. Most of the boundary followed the 141st meridian, but in the region of The Alaska Panhandle, the border was described as "parallel to the Coast". If you look at this convoluted stretch of the "coast", with its countless fjords and islands, you will be able to see how easily disputes could arise. The Russian maps used by the United States drew the boundary parallel to the inner coast, following all the bays and fjords, and ignoring the Alexander Archipelago. The Canadians, on the other hand, drew it parallel to the outer coast, which would have put Juneau as well as other locations for seaports in Canada. Nobody paid attention until gold was discovered in the Yukon; suddenly, Canadian access to the ocean became valuable.

In 1898, the US and Great Britian signed a treaty which would have allowed for a survey of the boundary. However, the U.S. Sentate rejected it. By this time, the United States had become the predominant industrial power in the world, and Great Britain was in an arms race with Germany. The Hay/Herbert Treaty of 1903 set up a commission, consisting of three American delegates, two Canadian delegates, and a British delegate. Theodore Roosevelt "spoke softly" to the commissioners via his delegates Elihu Root and Henry Cabot Lodge. In 1908, the commission gave all of the disputed territory to the United States.

Finally, in 1925, a treaty was signed defining the entire boundary between the two countries. The only other change chopped off the tip of Minnesota off at the Northwest Angle rather than the actual northwesternmost point of the Lake of the Woods.

The border is now defined as a chain of straight lines between 5,528 monuments (on land) and buoys (in the water). The treaty set up an International Boundary Commission which is responsible for maintaining the boundary monuments and buoys, approving construction that crosses the border, as well as who gets jurisdiction for crimes committed at the border. Another of the tasks handed to them by the treaty is to maintain a 20-foot clear cut swath along the border. This is required by the treaty, although it mars the countryside, especially in the Waterton Glacier International Peace Park.


1The Royal Proclamation, October 7, 1763 can be found at the Solon Law Archive,
http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/PreConfederation/rp_1763.html,
or at The Avalon Project at Yale Law School,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/proc1763.htm

2Founder's Library, Quebec Act, 1774
http://www.founding.com/library/lbody.cfm?id=95&parent=17

3The name at that time for the Saint Lawrence River, from Lake Ontario to Montreal.

4Article 2, Treaty of Paris, 1783 The University of Oklahoma Law Center
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/paris.html

5The Jay Treaty, 1794, Treaty of Amity Commerce and Navigation, found at A Hypertext on American History
http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/D/1776-1800/foreignpolicy/jay.htm.
This can also be found at http://earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/jaytreaty/text.html

6Ibid., Article 5.

7Ibid, Explanatory Article.

8The Treaty of Ghent can be found at numerous locations. One such place is the Avalon Project at Yale Law School,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britian/ghent.htm

9Convention of 1818, Avalon Project,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britian/conv1818.htm

10Article 1, The Webster-Ashburton Treaty. August 9, 1842, Avalon Project,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britian/br-1842.htm

11Ibid, Article 2

12The Oregon Treaty, 1846, found at the Center for Columbia River History,
http://www.ccrh.org/comm/river/docs/ortreaty.htm

SURVEYING THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES by Donald A. Wise
http://home.earthlink.net/~dawise/Maine.htm

ICE Case Studies, The United States-Canada Border Dispute,
http://www.american.edu/TED/ice/alaska.htm

International Boundary Commission
http://www.internationalboundarycommission.org

On October 10, 2007 people in Ontario, Canada will go to the polls for the 2007 Ontario provincial election. At the same time, they will vote for or against an electoral reform proposal that would change the method of voting for future provincial elections.

How the Referendum Came About

The Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform was established by the provincial government to review Ontario's existing Single Member Plurality (aka 'first past the post') riding-based electoral system, in use since 1792, to see if it should be retained or replaced. The Assembly was formed of 'ordinary citizens' — 51 men and 52 women, (ages 19 to 78) one from each of the 103 ridings, plus chairperson George Thomson. People of different ethnicities, including aboriginal peoples, were included in the Assembly selection process. Of the 104, 27 were born outside of Canada.

The members of the Assembly met to learn about the electoral systems and process and how the votes are counted. They studied other systems used in Canada and elsewhere in the world. Using a combination of private study sessions and 41 public consultations, the Assembly heard from Ontarians and learned what it needed to know to make an informed choice. Input was not limited to current voters — a special assembly of high school students, as future voters, also had their say.

How Alternatives were Evaluated

In evaluating different systems, the Assembly had a mandate to use this list of criteria:

  • accountability
  • effective parliament - government and opposition parties are included, and can work together to form a functional legislature.
  • effective parties - the existence of strong political parties with different agendas is encouraged.
  • fairness of representation - all types of voters are represented; all votes are equal; parties are represented in proportion to the votes that they receive.
  • legitimacy - voters can have confidence in the process and its results
  • stable and effective government
  • stronger voter participation - voters will be encouraged to vote; all votes will "matter" even in strongly held local ridings.
  • voter choice - voters have a range of choice on the ballot.

The Assembly added "simple and practical" to this list. Voters need to be able to understand the system.

What was Recommended

After consideration, the Assembly decided to recommend Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) as a new electoral system. Why? The Assembly felt that of the systems it considered, MMP best met the criteria above. They boiled those down to the main benefits below:

Greater voter choice

The Assembly says that MMP provides greater voter choice by letting voters cast two separate votes on their election ballot, one for their individual constituency representative and one for a political party. Voters may choose to exercise only one of these two votes, if they so desire.

Details: The first vote cast would be for the riding's Member of Provincial Parliament, or MPP), using the plurality ('first past the post') system to determine the winner, as happens today. The second vote would be for a political party, which might be the same party as, or different than, the party their choice for MPP represents. The party vote is not cast for any specific individual, though the individuals from each party who could be selected as a result are known and published in a list beforehand.

Commentary: This concept partly frees voters to make the best individual choice for their riding, while still supporting the political party that they prefer, should those two differ. Voters who say "I like Candidate A, but I can't stand Party X that he represents." can thus vote for Candidate A, and also for Party Y. Of course, it could also lead to voters trying to guess who will form the government and vote locally that way, hoping to score a cabinet minister.

Fairer election results

The Assembly felt that MMP produces fairer results - the number of seats allocated to each political party better represents their share of the popular vote.

Details:

After the riding results are known, parties are assigned "list seats" in a manner that approximates the overall attribution of party votes. In the Ontario proposal, there will be 90 ridings, and 39 list seats, for a total of 129 MPPs. The 39 list seats are divided amongst the parties in a way that makes their combined representation (local and list MPPs) roughly represent their share of the party vote. Parties cannot lose riding MPPs this way, they can only gain additional seats as needed to make up their proportion of the vote.

Commentary:

Past Ontario elections have seen a party win a majority of seats with less than 50% of the popular vote. Infamously, the 1990 Ontario provincial election saw a huge protest vote. To everyone's surprise, the New Democratic Party capture a majority (74 of 130 seats) with only 37.6% of the popular vote. Under an MMP system, a minority would likely have resulted instead, which would very likely have been more representative of Ontarian's desires.

Stronger representation

MMP preserves the strong local representation of the current system. Each geographic area remains part of a (slightly larger) riding, which still has its local MPP to focus on local issues and represent the riding. MMP also allows each geographic region to be represented in government through the list members, who can be assigned to represent areas that did not elect local MPPs from the party that forms the government.

Stability of government

The Assembly acknowledges that minority or coalition governments are more likely under MMP than the current system, but does not believe that this is destabilizing. Its report points out that Germany, which uses MMP for the Bundestag, has had 16 elections since 1948, while Ontario under the current Single Member Plurality system has also had 16 elections in that time.

The Assembly also speculates that abrupt shifts in party power are less likely in the MMP system than under Single Member Plurality, where voters often "punish" one party by throwing support to its opposition.

Effectiveness of parliament

The Assembly notes that MMP produces a less adversarial system where the parties cooperate more and do more work in all-party committees. Opposition party members are less likely to be "waiting" for the next election, and more likely to be doing real work for the voters.

What Else was Considered

The Assembly considered Single Transferrable Vote as its second choice, but members felt that it would work poorly for Ontario, with its dense urban centers and large and sparsely populated Northern Ontario ridings. (STV is arguably better suited to municipal elections for urban centers.) In selecting alternative systems, the Assembly voted 75 to 25 in favour of recommending MMP over STV, with one spoiled ballot and two absentees. In then recommending the change, the Assembly voted 86 to 16 in favour of recommending MMP over the current system, with one absentee.

Proposed Implementation of MMP

The general details of MMP can be covered in Mixed Member Proportional. As to its proposed implementation in Ontario:

There will be two ways for MPPs to be elected, riding and list. Riding will work as it always has, but the current 103 riding seats (increasing to 107 on October 10, 2007) will decrease to 90. 39 list seats will be added, for a total of 129 seats (still 1 less than the 130 MPPS of the 1990s.) With 129 MPPs, Ontario will still have far fewer representatives for its population than any other Canadian province or territory.

The proposed proportion of riding seats to list seats is 70:30. This is a relatively higher proportion of riding seats to list seats than other regions that use MMP, where the proportions are usually more like 50:50.

These proportions should ensure that situations will not normally arise where a party has more local seats than its party vote apportions. In MMP terms, this situation is called "overhang". Some MMP systems temporarily create more seats to balance the overhang. The Assembly's proposed MMP system does not. If an overhang occurs, the list seats will be allocated in the way that closest matches the party vote, but the overhang will inflate the number of seats allocated to the party in question versus their popular vote, and reduce the other parties' share accordingly. The Assembly feels that this situation will rarely occur.

The official parties will nominate local candidates, and also a party list, which will be published will before the election. The party is required to make the way these names were chosen public. The lists should ideally represent a mix of regions, gender, and ethnicity. The names of local candidates and list candidates may overlap. Elections Ontario will publish the lists widely.

These lists are closed, which means that the order of names is fixed and voters cannot select a specific list candidate or rearrange the name order in any way. One expected benefit of this is increased representation for women and ethnic groups in the legislature.

When seats are apportioned, each party first gets it locally elected members. Then, if it is entitled to more MPPs under MMP than it elected based on its percentage of the party vote, those MPPS will be selected in order from the party list, skipping anyone who was elected already as a riding MPP. Several formulas exist for apportioning the list seats. The Assembly has recommended the Hare formula which has the virtue of relative simplicity.

The Assembly's recommended implementation of MMP requires a party to get at least 3% of the total vote to be entitled a list seat in the provincial legislature. In past elections, the closest a "small party" came to 3% of the popular vote was the Green party, with 2.8% of the vote in 2003. Any party, regardless of popular vote, can carry a specific riding if its candidate wins a plurality in that riding.

Any vacancies in local ridings between elections would be filled by by-election, as usual. Any vacancies in list ridings would be filled with the next eligible name from the party list. If a list member were to quit his or her party, they might (or might not) have to resign the list seat. The Assembly makes no recommendation on this point.

Criticisms of MMP

A number of criticisms have been levelled at MMP. In the main, I think that these counter-arguments come from a position of mistrust in both politicians and voters. I will not attempt to argue for their side here. Instead, I will report them as I understand them, and lightly rebut them where I feel it is warranted. Some prominent political experts do echo these objections, though. The leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, John Tory, is one of those who cites many of the arguments below in discussing MMP, though he has not taken an official stand against it to date. Ontario Energy Minister Dwight Duncan is on record as opposing MMP.

Fewer local ridings

The number of ridings would drop from 107 to 90. However, the reduction from 130 to 103 ridings in 2000, a reduction of 21%, which was hardly noticed by the average Ontarian. This further 16% reduction will be balanced by 39 new MPPs who will represent all Ontarians. I personally find this criticism to be spurious.

Politicians chosen by other politicians

The NO MMP web site suggests that list members will be chosen by politicians, and implies that this is necessarily nefarious and underhanded. While this could happen, voters are unlikely to be supportive of parties who do this, unless every party acts in this way. In jurisdictions currently using MMP, the party lists are created in very public fashions, often by open party votes. I personally find this criticism to be reactionary.

Back-door deal-making

The NO MMP web site suggests that parties will dicker to form a coalition. This is undoubtedly true, just as it is today when minority governments form. There's no clear reason to think that this horse-trading will be any less public than it is today. Such is the power of the free press. One can as easily view MMP as fostering party cooperation as opposed to skullduggery, as NO MMP chooses to do. It is also valid to argue that the real back-door dealing happens within the parties, which are (of course) loose coalitions of other individuals, groups, and special interests.

More politicians

The number of MPPs would rise by 22, with corresponding expenses in salary and staff. However, this is still 1 less than the 130 MPPs which sat from 1987 to 1999. (The Mike Harris government reduced the legislature with its Fewer Politicians Act.) It seems to me that 22 MPPs and staff is a small price to pay for the benefits of proportional representation.

Confusing balloting and vote-counting

MMP is more complex than Single Member Plurality. There are two votes to count, and the voting must be tallied in two stages: first the riding votes are decided, and then the list votes are apportioned. It will take longer, so clear and final results may not be available right away, possibly until the next day. However I trust that the broadcast networks will still confidently predict the broad results before bedtime.

A weaker, indecisive Ontario

This argument, being opinion, is difficult to refute. It will likely result in more minority governments, and may even result in different coalitions governing between elections. On the other hand, the balance of power is more likely to accurately reflect the will of Ontarians, with large policy shifts coming less often, and shockers like the 1990 NDP victory less likely.

Fringe parties holding the balance of power

It's possible that, say, the Green party could hold the key to a government's survival of a non-confidence motion. However, a 3% popular vote threshold should keep most one-note parties from gaining a seat. Even the Green party has yet to break that barrier under current voting rules.

The need to lean on others for support can be a spur to cooperation rather than a sinister threat. Some Canadians feel that the early-1970s federal Liberal minority, supported by the NDP, was among Canada's most productive parliaments. We can also look to the current federal Conservative minority, which has successfully brokered deals with various opposition parties to keep itself afloat long after pundits predicted.

Voter dislike of specific list members

The NO MMP web site makes a big deal of the fact that if you don't like someone at the top of a party list, there's no way you can keep them from being elected if the party gets sufficient support to earn a list seat. That may be true, but then again there's no way to prevent the election of the 89 local MPPs who aren't in your riding, either, many of whom you may like even less! The parties will want their list members to attract voters, not to repel them. If a voter finds him or herself unable to support any party's list, that voter can simply choose not to exercise that half of the ballot.

Support for MMP

CBC news, in its report on Minister Duncan's views, notes that several ministers of Ontario's government (Attorney General Michael Bryant, Municipal Affairs Minister John Gerretsen, and Health Minister George Smitherman) support MMP. Other support crosses party lines. Former NDP leaders Ed Broadbent, Stephen Lewis, and Bob Rae (now a Liberal) support MMP. Current Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett, Conservative senator Hugh Segal, and Toronto mayor David Miller are in favour. Former Green Party of Canada leader Jim Harris, current Green Party leader Elizabeth May, and current Green Party of Ontario leader Frank de Jong are supporters. Each feels that the results would be more fair, and more effective.

Segal's speech supporting the proposal from the Conservative point of view is particularly interesting. He says, in part:

We have a rare chance here in Ontario to show leadership and take the simple position that every vote counts; that governments should not be chosen by accident; that the electoral system should not guarantee distortion and misrepresentation of how the voters actually voted! We have the chance to modernize, democratize, legitimize and upgrade the democratic process in Canada’s largest, most diverse province.

And then there's Dalton

Premier Dalton McGuinty has made no official statement about the referendum. It is generally assumed that he is aware of it.

For the Proposal to Succeed

Basically, the proposal needs to gather a metric butt load of votes in its favour during the upcoming referendum. The proposal must win at least 60% of voter support overall, as well as approval by a majority of voters in at least 60% of individual electoral districts (ridings). With little public visibility so far, and only weeks to go, this seems unlikely. However, an NDP majority in 1990 was unlikely too, yet it did happen. I hope that any and all Ontarians reading this writeup will vote in the referendum on October 10th.

Results

Of the 107 ridings in Ontario's 2007 election, 60% — 64 ridings — needed a straight majority (50% + 1) to approve MMP. In fact, only five ridings did, all in the provincial capital of Toronto (Davenport, Beaches — East York (by 80 votes), Parkdale — High Park, Toronto — Danforth, and Toronto — Trinity-Spadina). The proposal received 36.8% per cent approval from voters province-wide, with 1,548,234 votes in favour and 2,661,781 votes opposed. This result is almost identical to the approval rating from Prince Edward Island in that province's 2005 referendum on electoral reform.

Many voters reportedly arrived at the polling stations still unaware of the referendum and uninformed about their choices. Overall turnout was only 52.6% of eligible voters, a record low.


Sources and Sites